About Me

Name: SickofIt
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

5 years to Iranian nuke ?




Considering the ineffectiveness of the US Intelligence agencies of the past years, one certainly cannot hold out much hope that their 'timeline" is accurate.  There are Israeli thoughts that the timeline may be closer to 6 months 
(
http://www.yonitheblogger.com/  And are we supposed to derive some comfort in the fact that it may be 5 years away ? I hope this will not encourage Bush to continue to drag his feet to stop this. No sanctions wil stop this. How many lines in the sand are we to continue to redraw back towards our own feet? And the Israeli's feet ? I hope the Israelis get strong leadership in place and soon. They need to stop Iran if the US refuses to. It is a shame that the US seems to have gone weak in the knees at the most crucial time in history. The United States must join with Israel and stop the going forward of Irans nuclear program. I hope the President backs up all his eloquent calls to win this war by action, where needed, in Iran.

"I have a perfect horror of words that are not backed up by deeds."  T. Roosevelt 

A time line of the pioneering effort to develop a nuclear bomb:
Manhattan Project initiated: June 1942
Fermi brings CP-1 Critical at the University of Chicago: Dec 1942
Enrichment plant construction beings at Oak Ridge: 1943
U-235 rolls off the line: 1945
Trinity explosion: July 1945 (Three Years and One Month after project begins
Hiroshima: August 1945

It’s a lot harder to develop and troubleshoot new techniques than it is to buy them from Russia.



*************************

the Washington Times:

The U.S. military is operating under the assumption that Iran is five to eight years away from being able to build its first nuclear weapon, a time span that explains a general lack of urgency within the Bush administration to use air strikes to disable Tehran's atomic program.
Defense sources familiar with discussions of senior military commanders say the five- to eight-year projection has been discussed inside the Pentagon, which is updating its war plan for Iran. The time frame is generally in line with last year's intelligence community estimate that Iran could have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon by the beginning or middle of the next decade.
But the sources said that while the five-year window provides President Bush additional time to decide on whether to launch military strikes, they suspect it underestimates Iran's determination to build a bomb as quickly as possible.
Iran faces a United Nations Security Council deadline today to stop enriching uranium or face economic sanctions.
Advocates of stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions point to gaps in what the U.S. intelligence community really knows about Iran's secretive process. They also point to the fact that Iraq was much closer to building the bomb than the U.S. thought in 1991, when Operation Desert Storm air strikes destroyed much of Baghdad's atomic capability.

*******************************************************
And this ? 

Iran Seen having problems with nuclear program

WASHINGTON - Iran appears to be encountering technical difficulties with its uranium enrichment but this does not diminish the fact that it has nuclear ambitions and is acting on them, U.S. officials and experts said on Thursday. "Have they encountered technical difficulties? Absolutely, because this is a very difficult thing to do," Undersecretary of State Robert Joseph, the top U.S. non-proliferation official, told Reuters.    http://news.yahoo.com/fc/world/iran
**********************

The USA did it in about that timeframe (5 years), and that was 60+ years ago, before computers, before anyone knew it even could be done. And we also did not have Russian scientist helping, Pakistan's Dr. Khan help, and a field of already available enriched uranium , the North Koreans, the Russians, Chinese, the Pakistanis. The Iranians already are seperating the fuel, the centrifuges are already running.





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Appeasement to Islamofacist

  "Israel is parasite in the heart of the Muslim world" ~ Khatami

Excerpt from U.S. State department briefing, August 29, 2006
regarding issuance of Visa to former Iranian President Khatami

Mr. Casey: I think, you know, this is an opportunity in part for former President Khatami to hear the concerns of the American people, and I suspect not only in New York but certainly in the other places he travels to he’s going to get some tough questions from the American people who he does meet with. And I think it’s important that we recognize that we are an open society, we are willing to have a free exchange and a free debate over any and all ideas. I think it will be refreshing to have an Iranian leader face some of those kinds of questions.



Khatami with Nasrallah

by Jerry Gordon

Yesterday in a State department briefing it was announced that former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, the ’smiley faced’ Mullah ‘reformist’ was issued his Visa to come to the U.S. for what turns out to be 40 to 50 speaking engagements including the one at the Washington National Cathedral to attend a conference of the “Dialogues of Civilizations” next Friday, September 8th.

The Council of Amercian Islamic relations (CAIR) is throwing a glittering hallal dinner on his behalf that evening at a Marriott facility in nearby northern Virginia.

You know Khatami not only from his overblown term as Iran’s former ‘refomist’ President but from all those photo ops available on the internet with terrorist Hezbollah head, Sheik Nasrallah, the late Sheik Yassin and Khaled Marshaal of Hamas and the head of Islamic Jihad on obligatory trips to Tehran. They were there for to coordinate terrorist actions and receive ‘lagniappes’ (something ‘extra” in Cajun) of cash, arms, missiles and training from the Islamic Republic in actions against Israel and America.

One of the questions raised in the State Department news session yesterday - see below - was whether or not he would be fingerprinted upon arrival in the U.S. Of course, the State Department won’t go that far. Ken Timmerman, the veteran Iran watcher and I spoke about these morally troubling developments this morning. It is as he said like a “Star Wars’ scenario where Yoda cautions young Skywalker about the dark side suddenly making an apperance while the republic forces were “asleep.” Apt analogy that.

Yesterday, Israeli chief Rabbi Metzger was speaking at the concluding session of the 2006 World Conference of Religions for Peace (WCRP), in Kyoto, Japan, when former President Khatami and his delegation rose and walked out. Rabbi Metzger was trying to get the organziation to pass along ’siddurs’ or Jewish prayerbooks to IDF soldiers kidnapped by Hezbolleh, Iran’s proxy. You can bet that Khatami would do the same in next Friday’s Washington National Cathedral if another Jewish cleric arose to speak of….’peace.’

So, I wonder why the State Department issued Khatami his Visa? Hmm?

According to Timmerman and press notices, Khatami will speak at a number of prestigious venues including that bastion of Israel-hate, the U.N. in Manhattan, my less than illustrious alma mater, Columbia, Georgetown, Harvard, the University of Chicago, the University of Virginia and Catholic University in Washington, DC.

We even understand that ole ‘Jimma” Carter is angling to invite Khatami to speak at the Carter Center in Atlanta. That figures. Carter probably suffers from the so-called Stockholm syndrome, as he failed to rescue those Amercians at the U.S. Embassy in 1979 at which Ahmadinejad surfaced as a terrorist bad guy and thug threatening detainees.

General Brent Scowcroft who practices neo-Straussian “reality” diplomacy and has argued for ‘engaging’ in diplomatic and back channel discussions with the Islamic Republic probably put the word out via Bush senior.

Khatami will cut a broad figure in the media circus created by this trip. Doubtless he will be protected by the entourage of close to 40 persons who will accompany him-his keepers no doubt, courtesy of Ahamdinejad. Maybe some terror co-ordinators for all we know, too.

The American Iranian Council (AIC) is ‘ecstatic” about this ‘breakthrough.’ As Boeing and CONOCO are members of the AIC and doubtless other American commercial interest in the oil, and gas service industries, there is ‘hope’ that some significant business deals might be cut, notwithstanding the lack of diplomatic recognition of the terrorist Islamic republic.

All this occurred, as Timmerman correctly opined ‘under the radar screen.’

So much for ‘hanging tough’ in trying to fashion economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic and Ahmadinejad’s ‘lusting’ quest for nuclear enrichment and weaponized plutonium to fashion into missile warheads poised to fire at Israel, the EU and even the US via its ally North Korean-if they ever sort out the bits and pieces for those Taepodong III missiles.

Roderick met yesterday following the State Department announcement about Khatami’s visa to visit the U.S. with powerful Hill staffer in the Republican Leadership Conference, Barbara Leddeen, Staffers from Senator Rick Santorum’s office, Nina Shea of Freedom House to discuss coordination of protests and potentially scheduling a unified news conference on Friday, September 8th. Senator Rick Santorum’s website expressed his ‘outrage’ at the issuance of the Khatami Visa by the Bush Administration.

Second, both Democrats, Republicans and Senator Lieberman-a centrist Army of One from my home state of Connecticut - should hold press conferences objecting to Khatami’s presence in the U.S. For sure President Bush’s core supporters in the Congress and across the country have to communicate to him that this visit is completely off base and out of character from the ‘new’ GOP that left the clubbiness of business world and its objective of cutting ‘any and all deals’ without regard to moral clarity and responsibility.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Naguib Mahfouz - good riddance

May I preface to say that the President does speak on "behalf" of this American person in his praise of  Naguib Mahfouz . 

According to Reuters,

Dignitaries from around the world paid tribute to the author, including U.S. President George W. Bush. Mahfouz’s family had declined a U.S. offer for hospital treatment, Egyptian television reported.

“On behalf of the American people, the President and Mrs. Bush extend their deepest sympathies to Mr. Mahfouz’s family and friends and to the Egyptian people for the loss of an extraordinary artist who conveyed the richness of Egyptian history and society to the world,” a White House statement said.
***************************************************************

From al Aharam:

I do not recall ever having been more infuriated than at the monstrous Israeli attacks on the Palestinian territories, the siege on Arafat and the demand that he renounce “terrorism.”

While Israel’s actions are the most dangerous form of terrorism — because they are perpetuated by a state rather than by individuals — the Palestinians’ attempt to defend themselves in the name of identity and freedom is their only means of expressing hope. Suffering the worst kind of occupation in an age that has long freed itself of the vestiges of colonialism, the Palestinians have no option but armed resistance to Israeli savagery. All attempts at peace have failed, and Sharon has ignored the Arab proposal and violated international law with impunity. Their lives stripped of all meaning, who can blame the Palestinians for searching for some meaning in death?

By reoccupying the territories under PA control last Friday at dawn, Israel has declared war on the Palestinians — a barbaric war that violates all laws. But while the situation in Israel worsens economically, socially and psychologically, the Palestinians possess all the ingredients for victory.

Another gem from al Aharam:

What is happening in Lebanon cannot be a reaction to the capture of one or two Israeli soldiers. One would expect an action to produce a similar reaction. But Israel’s reaction is out of proportion to what Hizbullah did. This suggests that Israel had earlier plans to pounce upon Lebanon in this manner. This is why it paid no attention to Hizbullah’s offer to exchange the soldiers with prisoners held in Israel.


Hat tip : Israpundit 
  http://www.israpundit.com/2006/?p=2515#more-2515

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Death to Israel Rally in America

Increasingly, every morning when I get up and read the news I feel I am living in a parallel universe. This disturbing story reported by Michelle Malkin:

It began in Salt Lake City, Utah this morning. Reader Ruth e-mails:

Local (Salt Lake City) morning news-shows talked much about today's rallies and protests in view of the arrival of President Bush this evening. (The day kicks off with a Death to Israel rally at 9:00 am followed by the Mayor's anti-war protest at 10:30 am.) Not one local newscast, however, seemed alarmed by a Death to Israel rally; in fact they "reported" it as though they were announcing the next PTA meeting and included it in the list of events for today's special activities. I am ashamed to be a Utah today!

A few more details:

While Cpl. Adam Galvez's parents wait on the Marines to return their son's body to Utah, they're also planning to speak at a pro-troops President Bush rally this week. The Freedom rally is one of many scheduled for Wednesday when the President arrives.

The Freedom Rally will take place Wednesday at the northeast corner of Liberty Park. The Galvezes are scheduled to speak sometime between 11:30am and 1:30pm, as long as it doesn't interfere with funeral arrangements for their son.

Organizers say it will be a positive, NON-political rally centered on supporting troops. It's one of several public events taking place this week.

Thousands of Utahns are expected to participate in various demonstrations while President Bush, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld are in town for the Legion convention. Registration for demonstration permits closed Friday and so far we know of rallies with themes ranging from anti-war, and anti-Israel, to pro-U.S. troops and Pro Bush.

The "Death to Israel" group applied for the longest permit, fourteen hours. They are meeting around Washington Square. A protest organizer says they may not have someone there the entire time the permit is good for, but wanted the option of being there at all times.

http://michellemalkin.com




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Say No To United States Granting Visa To Mohammad Khatami

 

From the Simon Wiesenthal Center: Say No To United States Granting Visa To Mohammad Khatami

Please join the Simon Wiesenthal Center in urging the United States not to grant a visa to the former Iranian President, Mohammad Khatami, who has been invited to speak at the prestigious Washington National Cathedral.

Granting former President Khatami a visa at this time, coming on the heels of both Iran’s proxy war in Lebanon and it’s refusal to drop its nuclearization program will be viewed by the mullahs as a reward for their policy of confrontation and hatred toward the United States and her allies.

Then-Iranian President Mohammad Khatami (R) meets with Hezbollah leader, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, 2003 in Beirut, Lebanon.

There are those who argue that Mr. Khatami is a moderate, but when he said in February 2005, “…if you delve a little deeper and exchange the words of Bush and bin Laden, you will be unable to distinguish between the two,” - those are not the words of a moderate.

When he called Israel, “A parasite in the heart of the Muslim world,” - it was not a voice of moderation speaking.

Khatami has been invited to speak on his “Dialogue of Civilizations” initiative and on his views of the role of the three Abrahamic faiths. Yet, as far as the Jewish people are concerned, he has always denied the validity and centrality of Israel to Judaism, a fact embraced by the overwhelming majority of world Jewry.

So, with whom is he dialoguing?

We know that some argue that it is in the best interest of the United States to open a dialogue with Iran. However, that regime’s refusal to compromise and its continued sponsorship of international terrorist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas are proof positive that now is not the time.

Please use this link to urge United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice not to grant President Khatami a visa.

As mentioned, Khatami is scheduled for a speech at the National Cathedral:

The Rev. Samuel T. Lloyd III, dean of the National Cathedral, said, "It will be an honor for the cathedral to provide a platform for President Khatami. President Khatami’s commitment to a dialogue between civilizations and cultures is an important component in the peace process. This is much needed in the world today.”

...and then a dinner with CAIR (same link).


http://www.solomonia.com/blog/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Annan booed in Hezbollah stronghold

Guess they are disappointed with Annan because he (along with the US and the disasterous governemt of Israel under Olmert) is allowing Hezzbollah to rearm. They should reconsider their ire, after all Kofi is really one of thier own at heart.

From correspondents in Haret Hreik

UN chief Kofi Annan was booed by a crowd chanting pro-Hezbollah slogans today as he toured Beirut's southern suburbs devastated by Israel's war against the Shiite militant group.

Dozens of men, women and children angrily waved pictures of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and shouted "Allah, Nasrallah and all of the suburbs" as the UN secretary general emerged from his car to survey the destruction in the heart of the Haret Hreik area, a Hezbollah stronghold.

Others booed and shouted "death to Israel" and "long live Syria" as they surrounded Mr Annan's convoy of vehicles which was accompanied by a heavy security detail.

Mr Annan was accompanied by Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Siniora, Foreign Minister Fawzi Sallukh as well as Hezbollah MPs.

His visit lasted barely 10 minutes as nervous security officers whisked him quickly out of the area.

The United Nations and the international community were much criticised during Israel's offensive for failing to stop the bloodshed that claimed almost 1500 lives, most of them Lebanese civilians.

One woman, clad in a black chador, laid a portrait of Nasrallah face down on the tinted glass of one of the moving vehicles.

"To hell with the United Nations and Annan," said Jamil Bashir Al-Abed, 31, a resident of the area whose home was damaged by the Israeli bombardments.

"Let him look at what the UN and the United States have done and at all this destruction," he said, pointing to flattened building and tons of debris. "This is their work."

A group of women carrying posters of Nasrallah angrily denounced the United Nations saying the world body was in collusion with Israel.

"Isn't he (Annan) ashamed of what happened to us?" said one of the women who would only give her name as Ihsan.

"He's as powerless as the rest of them to stop Israel's aggression."

Another woman, however, praised Mr Annan saying that he had demonstrated his solidarity with the Lebanese people by travelling to Beirut.

"I heard what he said earlier on television and I think he is a man of peace," she said.

Prior to Mr Annan's arrival, bulldozers and dump trucks could be seen clearing rubble as patriotic music blasted in the background and street vendors sold key chains emblazoned with Nasrallah's image or CDs of his speeches.

Several also distributed free posters of the Hezbollah leaders to the crowd.

Mr Annan arrived in Beirut today for a two-day visit during which he was to meet with Lebanese leaders to discuss the deployment of UN troops in southern Lebanon and other security issues.

He is due to travel to the southern town of Naqura tomorrow before heading to Israel.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20288901-1702,00.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America's Muslims Aren't as Assimilated as You Think

If only the Muslims in Europe -- with their hearts focused on the Islamic world and their carry-on liquids poised for destruction in the West -- could behave like the well-educated, secular and Americanizing Muslims in the United States, no one would have to worry.

So runs the comforting media narrative that has developed around the approximately 6 million Muslims in the United States, who are often portrayed as well-assimilated and willing to leave their religion and culture behind in pursuit of American values and lifestyle. But over the past two years, I have traveled the country, visiting mosques, interviewing Muslim leaders and speaking to Muslim youths in universities and Islamic centers from New York to Michigan to California -- and I have encountered a different truth. I found few signs of London-style radicalism among Muslims in the United States. At the same time, the real story of American Muslims is one of accelerating alienation from the mainstream of U.S. life, with Muslims in this country choosing their Islamic identity over their American one.

A new generation of American Muslims -- living in the shadow of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks -- is becoming more religious. They are more likely to take comfort in their own communities, and less likely to embrace the nation's fabled melting pot of shared values and common culture.

Part of this is linked to the resurgence of Islam over the past several decades, a growth as visible in Western Europe and the United States as it is in Egypt and Morocco. But the Sept. 11 attacks also had the dual effect of making American Muslims feel isolated in their adopted country, while pushing them to rediscover their faith.

From schools to language to religion, American Muslims are becoming a people apart. Young, first-generation American Muslim women -- whose parents were born in Egypt, Pakistan and other Islamic countries -- are wearing head scarves even if their mothers had left them behind; increasing numbers of young Muslims are attending Islamic schools and lectures; Muslim student associations in high schools and at colleges are proliferating; and the role of the mosque has evolved from strictly a place of worship to a center for socializing and for learning Arabic and Urdu as well as the Koran.

The men and women I spoke to -- all mosque-goers, most born in the United States to immigrants -- include students, activists, imams and everyday working Muslims. Almost without exception, they recall feeling under siege after Sept. 11, with FBI agents raiding their mosques and homes, neighbors eyeing them suspiciously and television programs portraying Muslims as the new enemies of the West.

Such feelings led them, they say, to adopt Islamic symbols -- the hijab , or head covering, for women and the kufi , or cap, for men -- as a defense mechanism. Many, such as Rehan, whom I met at a madrassa (religious school) in California with her husband, Ramy, also felt compelled to deepen their faith.

"After I covered, I changed," Rehan told me. "I felt I wanted to give people a good impression of Islam. I wanted people to know how happy I am to be Muslim." But not everyone understood, she said, recalling an incident in a supermarket in 2003: "The man next to me in the vegetable section said, 'You'd be much more beautiful without that thing on your head. It's demeaning to women.' " But to her the head scarf symbolized piety, not oppression.

A group of young college-educated women at the Dix mosque in Dearborn, Mich., described the challenges many Muslims face as they carve out their identity in the United States. I spoke with them in the winter of 2004, after they had been to the mosque one Sunday for a halaqa (a study circle) focused on integrating faith and daily life. They were in their twenties: Hayat, a psychologist; Ismahan, a computer scientist; and Fatma, a third-grade teacher.

Hayat said veiling was easier for her than it had been for her sister,

10 years her senior, because Hayat had more Muslim peers when she reached high school and felt far less pressure to conform to American ways. When she went on to the University of Michigan, she was surrounded for the first time by young Muslims who dared to show pride in their religion in a non-Muslim setting.

Ismahan recalled similar experiences. In elementary school, she had tried to fit in. As an adult, though, "I know I don't have to fit in," she said. "I don't think Muslims have to assimilate. We are not treated like Americans. At work, I get up from my desk and go to pray. I thought I would face opposition from my boss. Even before I realized he didn't mind, I thought, 'I have a right to be a Muslim, and I don't have to assimilate.' "

Fatma described the mosque as central to her future: "What made me sane during years of public high school," she said, "was coming to the halaqa every Sunday." Fatma was also quick to distinguish herself from other young Muslim women who embrace American mores. "Some Muslims do anything to fit in. They drink. They date. My biggest fear is that I might assimilate to the American lifestyle so much that my modesty goes out the window."

Imam Zaid Shakir -- who teaches at San Francisco's Zaytuna Institute, America's only true madrassa -- refers to such young Muslims as the "rejectionist generation." They are rejectionist, he says, because they turn their backs not only on absolutist religious interpretations, but also on America's secular ways. Many of these young American Muslims look to Shakir (and to celebrated Zaytuna founder Hamza Yusuf) for guidance on how to live pious lives in the United States.
Despite contemporary public opinion -- or perhaps because of it -- Muslim Americans consider Islam their defining characteristic, beyond any national identity. In this way, their experience in the United States resembles that of their co-religionists in Europe, where mosques are also growing, Islamic schools are being built, and practicing the faith is the center of life, particularly for the young generation. In Europe and the United States, young Muslims are unifying around popular imams they believe understand the challenges they face in Western societies; these leaders include Yusuf in the United States and Amer Khaled, an Egyptian-born imam who lives in Britain. Thousands of young Muslims attend their lectures.

In my years of interviews, I found few indications of homegrown militancy among American Muslims. Indeed, thus far, they have proved they can compete economically with other Americans. Although the unemployment rate for Muslims in Britain is far higher than for most other groups, the average annual income of a Muslim household surpasses that of average American households. Yet, outside the workplace, Muslims retreat into the comfort zone of their mosques and Islamic schools.

(Blame America)

It is too soon to say where the growing alienation of American Muslims will lead, but it seems clear that the factors contributing to it will endure. U.S. foreign policy persists in dividing Muslim and Western societies, making it harder still for Americans to realize that there is a difference between their Muslim neighbor and the plotter in London or the kidnapper in Baghdad.


Snipped from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/25/AR2006082501169_2.html





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Text of Ahmadinejad letter to Merkel

And keep in mind that even after Merkel got this letter from Ahmadinejad, Germany will not declare they are behind UN sanctions against Iran (along with France and Britain ). The old saying " If we do not learn from history we are bound to repeat it." is clearly ringing from the mountain tops, but the world is holding their collective hands over their ears ! Those who would shout " Never again ! ", must be saying
" AGAIN !? "

++++++++++++++++++

"Full Text of Pres. Ahmadinejad's Letter to German Chancellor"
In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate
Her Excellency Angela Merkel
The Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany
Excellency,
Please accept my warmest greetings.
If it had it not been for Germany being a great contributor to progress in science, philosophy, literature, arts and politics;
If it had not been for a more important and positive influence of Germany in international relations and promotion of peace;
Moreover, if it had not been for the persistence of a strong will by certain global powers and special groups to constantly portray Germany as defeated and indebted country of World War II in order to continue their extortions;
And if it had not been for the presence of Your Excellency at the top of the executive branch of your country as an experienced stateswoman with bitter and sweet experiences in two dissimilar societies with different political systems and traditions,
And at the same time, if it had not been for the advantages that are limited to women, such as stronger human sentiments and certain manifestations of the divine compassion and kindness, specially in the position of a mother and being at the service of the people, and the common responsibility of all people with faith in God to defend human dignity and worth and to prevent violations of their rights and their humiliation, and proceeding from this conviction that we are all created by the Almighty and He has bestowed upon us all dignity and no one has any special privileges over the other, and under no circumstances could a society be deprived of its rights, barred from pursuit of progress and perfection or be controlled or humiliated;
Finally, if it had not been for the oppression, however different, of our nations, our shared responsibility to promote justice as the most basic foundation for promotion of peace and human equality, I would not have found the motive to write this letter.
Honorable Chancellor
Rulers come and go, but people with culture and history and their attachments and desires will keep on staying. Opportunities in front of those in position of high power are transient, even if they may be vast and broad. These opportunities are very auspicious and can play a key role in the negative and positive transformations and developments of a nation.
Those in position of high power do not normally have many opportunities, but are accountable before the Almighty and people due to their high responsibility. We know this, and you know it as well.
Some of these developments can have regional, continental and global ramifications and can hardly be overlooked.
[...]
Excellency
World War II came to an end with all its material and moral losses and its 60 million casualties. The death of human beings is tragic and sad. In all divine religions and before all awakened conscience and pure nature of mankind and the sense of right and wrong, the life, property and honor of people, regardless of their religious persuasion and ethnic background, must be respected at all times and all places.
Sixty years have passed since the end of the war. But, regrettably the entire world and some nations in particular are still facing its consequences. Even now the conduct of some bullying powers and power-seeking and aggressive groups is the conduct of victors with the vanquished.
The extortion and blackmail continue, and people are not allowed to think about or even question the source of this extortion, otherwise they face imprisonment. When will this situation end? Sixty years, one hundred years or one thousand years, when? I am sorry to remind you that today the perpetual claimants against the great people of Germany are the bullying powers and the Zionists that founded the Al-Qods Occupying Regime with the force of bayonets in the Middle East.
The Honorable Chancellor
I have no intention of arguing about the Holocaust. But, does it not stand to reason that some victorious countries of World War II intended to create an alibi on the basis of which they could continue keeping the defeated nations of World War II indebted to them. Their purpose has been to weaken their morale and their inspiration in order to obstruct their progress and power. In addition to the people of Germany, the peoples of the Middle East have also borne the brunt of the Holocaust. By raising the necessity of settling the survivors of the Holocaust in the land of Palestine, they have created a permanent threat in the Middle East in order to rob the people of the region of the opportunities to achieve progress. The collective conscience of the world is indignant over the daily atrocities by the Zionist occupiers, destruction of homes and farms, killing of children, assassinations and bombardments.
[...]
It is sad to admit that Europe has lost a lot of its clout in global interactions and has not been able to face and overcome major challenges by relying on itself. This is, of course, understandable. The big powers outside of the continent intend to prove that Europe cannot rely on itself and do anything without their help and intervention.
Our people have also suffered from the interventions by some of the victors of the war after World War II. For many years they interfered in our internal affairs and did not want to see our nation conquer the pinnacles of progress and perfection. They had their eyes on our natural wealth, above all on our energy resources. To secure their own interests, they overthrew the legally constituted government of the time, installed a dictatorial regime and supported it to the end. Later, they supported Saddam in the war imposed on our people and observed no humanitarian boundary in their support for the Iraqi dictator. Our nation has experienced the pain and anguish from the interferences of those who are now crying out for human rights. There are still many suffering from the wounds and injuries of this war.
Many of these aggressions have taken place by those who regard themselves the victors of the World War II. They allow themselves to do whatever they wish, and unfortunately, after the end of the Cold War, the arrogance and expansionist ambitions of these powers have escalated.
We believe that still a major part of the peoples of the world and even international organizations are under the influence of the behavior and the conduct of the victors of the World War II.
[...]

And no missive from the Thug-in-Chief would be complete without the following sales pitch:

Where are the roots of these problems? How long can they continue? Do you not think that the main root lies in the fact that some of the rulers and powers of today have distanced themselves from the teachings of the divine prophets, the teachings of Abraham, Moses and Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) and the Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him).
[...]
Honorable Chancellor,
The inner instincts and nature of the peoples of the world have wakened up.
Tendency toward faith in the oneness of God is on the rise.

Tahwid, that is. Islamic monotheism.

People will no longer tolerate to be tyrannized, humiliated and their rights violated.
The prevailing circumstances today differ from those of yesterday. Multiple standards and approaches in relations will not endure.
Iran and Germany can play a more important role together in the international arena by relying on the noble and high values.
This cooperative relationship can also enhance the role of Europe on the global scene and serve as a model of cooperation between two governments and nations.
[...]
Together we will be able to prove to some powers that respecting other nations and their rights is good for them as well. Our two nations and governments, next to each other, will be able to play a fundamental role in promoting peace, security, progress, and human dignity at the scale of two countries and internationally.
In closing, I pray to the Almighty for the success of Your Excellency and the government and people of Germany.

http://www.farsnews.com/English/newstext.php?nn=8506060558

http://reuters.myway.com/article/20060826/2006-08-26T130524Z_01_BLA618392_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-NUCLEAR-IRAN-DC.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Annan/UN ~The map makers

 

If you have never looked at a map of Israel, you should. Look for a number of the cities and towns that the Bible mentions for example, Nazareth, Bethlehem and Jerusalem.

Now ask yourself, where did these names come from? Do these places have anything to do with the Jewish people? If you are wondering why I am asking these simple questions, I have a reason. Did you know theres a trend in the world today to wipe Israel off the map and replace Israel with a Palestinian nation?
Consider the following article titled UN Ceremony Includes Map of Palestine In Place of Israel published December 9, 2005. Here is how it begins:
The United Nations held a "Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People" . A large map of Palestine, with Israel literally wiped off the map, featured prominently in the festivities. The ceremony was held at the UN headquarters in New York and was attended by Secretary General Kofi Annan and the Presidents of the UN Security Council and the General Assembly. http://www.israelnn.com/news.php3?id=94461  DEC 9,2005
Now, you should have picked up the significance as you read this statement. A meeting that was held at the United Nations, attended by the Secretary General of the United Nations to honor the Palestinian people, displayed a map of the Middle East - without Israel on the map.
But that is not all. There is more to indicate that UN officials knew exactly what they were doing. Quoting again from the article:
With the map hanging behind him, Secretary-General Annan addressed the public meeting at UN Headquarters. At the start of the ceremony, the dignitaries present asked attendees to observe a moment of silence. I invite everyone present to rise and observe a minute of silence in memory of all those who have given their lives for the cause of the Palestinian people, the master of ceremonies said.
What was the purpose of wiping Israel off the map? Is this the direction the world is headed - a Middle East without Israel?

The UN is nothing more then a enmass representative of the Arab League
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What did you do in the war, UNIFIL?

 You broadcast Israeli troop movements.
by Lori Lowenthal Marcus

DURING THE RECENT month-long war between Hezbollah and Israel, U.N. "peacekeeping" forces made a startling contribution: They openly published daily real-time intelligence, of obvious usefulness to Hezbollah, on the location, equipment, and force structure of Israeli troops in Lebanon.

UNIFIL--the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, a nearly 2,000-man blue-helmet contingent that has been present on the Lebanon-Israel border since 1978--is officially neutral. Yet, throughout the recent war, it posted on its website for all to see precise information about the movements of Israeli Defense Forces soldiers and the nature of their weaponry and materiel, even specifying the placement of IDF safety structures within hours of their construction. New information was sometimes only 30 minutes old when it was posted, and never more than 24 hours old.

Meanwhile, UNIFIL posted not a single item of specific intelligence regarding Hezbollah forces. Statements on the order of Hezbollah "fired rockets in large numbers from various locations" and Hezbollah's rockets "were fired in significantly larger numbers from various locations" are as precise as its coverage of the other side ever got.

This war was fought on cable television and the Internet, and a lot of official information was available in real time. But the specific military intelligence UNIFIL posted could not be had from any non-U.N. source. The Israeli press--always eager to push the envelope--did not publish the details of troop movements and logistics. Neither the European press nor the rest of the world media, though hardly bastions of concern for the safety of Israeli troops,

provided the IDF intelligence details that UNIFIL did. A search of Israeli government websites failed to turn up the details published to the world each day by the U.N.

Inquiries made of various Israeli military and government representatives and analysts yielded near unanimous agreement that at least some of UNIFIL's postings, in the words of one retired senior military analyst, "could have exposed Israeli soldiers to grave danger." These analysts, including a current high ranking military official, noted that the same intelligence would not have been provided by the U.N. about Israel's enemies.

Sure enough, a review of every single UNIFIL web posting during the war shows that, while UNIFIL was daily revealing the towns where Israeli soldiers were located, the positions from which they were firing, and when and how they had entered Lebanese territory, it never described Hezbollah movements or locations with any specificity whatsoever.

Compare the vague "various locations" language with this UNIFIL posting from July 25:

Yesterday and during last night, the IDF moved significant reinforcements, including a number of tanks, armored personnel carriers, bulldozers and infantry, to the area of Marun Al Ras inside Lebanese territory. The IDF advanced from that area north toward Bint Jubayl, and south towards Yarun.

Or with the posting on July 24, in which UNIFIL revealed that the IDF stationed between Marun Al Ras and Bint Jubayl were "significantly reinforced during the night and this morning with a number of tanks and armored personnel carriers."

This partiality is inconsistent not only with UNIFIL's mission but also with its own stated policies. In a telling incident just a few years back, UNIFIL vigorously insisted on its "neutral ity"--at Israel's expense.
 
Read it all @ http://www.theweeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/622bqwjn.asp?pg=1

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

According to Jerusalem Post, IDF forces of the Golani Brigades discovered a Hizballah bunker on Saturday 26th August 2006, just a mere stone's throw away from a UN outpost.

The bunker had "shooting positions of poured concrete," and the combat posts inside were equipped with phone lines, showers, toilets, air ducts, and emergency exits, as well as logistical paraphernalia for Hizballah.

A Golani officer told the Jerusalem Post that among the force's findings was a Katyusha rocket launcher, most likely used in rocket attacks against northern Israel during the war.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525953897&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Ynet reports that Deputy Commander of the Golani Brigade, Lieutenant General Gasam Alian, said that "this is a bunker that sprawls on the ground two kilometers." The bunker can be seen on video.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3296419,00.html


What exactly is the UN doing there!


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel seeks troops from Muslim nations

 

"Israel seeks troops from Muslim nations," from AP:

JERUSALEM - Israel said Saturday it was encouraging some Muslim countries to send peacekeepers to southern Lebanon, a contribution that would lend credibility to the heavily European force....

The EU and U.N. agree the peacekeeping mission must have a strong Muslim component to give it credibility. Israel, however, objects to nations that do not recognize the Jewish state, saying such troops would make it impossible for Jerusalem to share intelligence with the U.N. force. That would exclude Indonesia, Bangladesh and Malaysia, which have offered troops.

But Israel said it has been in touch with other Muslim countries to encourage them to participate, particularly Turkey, which has diplomatic relations with Israel.

"If Turkey decides to send a contingent, we would welcome that," said Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev.

Jordan and Egypt also are among Muslim countries that have diplomatic relations with Israel. 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,210527,00.html

******************************************************
Olmert and his party must go. They are shepards who do not care for the sheep, and would have the sheep guarded by wolves. Will this protect Israel from Hizballah or protect Hizballah from Israel ? Olmert should be exiled to France. Muslim on muslim to protect Israel from attack by muslims! What folly. How much worse can get with Olmert at the helm of Israel ?
"The opportunity was there and now the nonsense will continue and quite frankly, the Jihadists have won the publicity/media war. Again, like with Carter in 79 and Reagan in Beirut, now with Olmert and Bush/Condi, the Jihadists have learned that they can get away with aggression without being thoroughly punished."

"My anger is kindled against the shepherds, And I will punish the male goats; For the LORD of Hosts has visited his flock, the house of Yehudah, And will make them as his horse in the battle that he is proud of."
Zech 10:3


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Defying U.N., Iran opens nuclear reactor

 Now it's a fait accompli. Will the West respond with a healthy sense of self-preservation?

Alert from AP:

KHONDAB, Iran - Iran's hard-line president on Saturday inaugurated a heavy-water production plant, a facility the West fears will be used to develop a nuclear bomb, as Tehran remained defiant ahead of a U.N. deadline that could lead to sanctions.
The U.N. has called on Tehran to stop the separate process of uranium enrichment — which also can be used to create nuclear weapons — by Thursday or face economic and political sanctions.


President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared that his nation's nuclear program poses no threat to other nations, even Israel, "which is a definite enemy."
Ahmadinejad said in a speech that Iran would never abandon what he once again called its purely peaceful nuclear program.

"There is no discussion of nuclear weapons," he said. "We are not a threat to anybody even the Zionist regime, which is a definite enemy for the people of the region."



+++++++++

"Unfortunately, I do not believe President Bush will act. Not due to inability. Because of the administration's sometimes / often faltering war in Iraq, Mr. Bush has acquired this self-image of weakness; a feckless wartime president.

Then there was the most recent ignominious ceasefire Mr. Bush imposed on Israel by commissioning the Arab-friendly Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice shepherd a flawed ceasefire resolution though the United Nations Security Council. This was the same Secretary Rice that pressured Israel to open the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza unimpeded to terrorists and weapons.

Thus we are left with weakened and neutered Israel that is poised to be in the most immediate danger from the Iranian mullahs and apocalyptic president of Iran.

Sadly in Israel we have another Bush foreign policy blunder. In an effort to secure the meekest, most pliable Israeli government, Mr. Bush folks made no secret that he wanted Mr. Olmert and his capitulationist Kadima government ruling in Israel.

After all, Mr. Bush has a vision for a 23 jihadist state in the Middle East. Ehud Olmert was seen as the best puppet-ruler to bring the Bush-vision about --- thus helping secure the president's legacy ---- a Palestinian terrorist state in the mountains of Israel (Judea and Samaria) and in Gaza and east Jerusalem. The Road Map to Peace ?

Now we are confronting Iran with a weak Executive in America and a incredibly weak puppet government in Israel thanks to Mr. Bush and his grandiose vision for Middle East "peace." "


There was a day when I would have thought Bush would have done something definitive about Iran, but after the Israel debacle I have lost any confidence in his will or strength do do more then send Condi to hobnob with the French again. Bush has stated that Iran having nukes in unacceptable, but what does that mean?

T. Roosevelt has a very applicable quote: "I have a perfect horror of words that are not backed up by deeds."

And the Russians have now advised, "no sanctions for now "

Not surprising since Russian Federation signed a billion dollar arms deal with Iran to supply them with the latest Russian weapons and military technology. They are also supplying Iran with their processed gasoline, since Iran is a net importer of gas, having little or no refinery capability of her own. As soon as Russia gets her money they won't care what we blow up in Iran. After all, whatever we destroy will have to be replaced by new Russian equipment. It's a win-win for Mother Russia. The game continues, sin fin........

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Musharraf faces bitter clash over rape law reforms

 

Musharraf faces bitter clash over rape law reforms

And democratic reforms are an "attack on Islam." More on this story from the Telegraph, with thanks to JE:

President Pervez Musharraf has opened a new and especially bitter confrontation with radical Islam by trying to rewrite Pakistan's controversial rape laws.

These place an almost impossible burden of proof on women by compelling them to produce four "pious" male witnesses to prove rape or risk being convicted of adultery and face 100 lashes or death by stoning.

This law, known as the Hudood Ordinance, has been regarded as untouchable since its passage 27 years ago.

It is regarded as untouchable because it is rooted in the Qur'an. After Muhammad's favorite wife, Aisha, is accused of adultery, he exonerates her with a revelation from Allah requiring four witnesses to establish a sexual offense: "Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they produce not witnesses, they verily are liars in the sight of Allah" (Qur’an 24:11). The adoption of this law was part of the long, slow abandonment of secular law by Pakistan.

It also sets no minimum age for sex with girls, saying only that they should have reached puberty.

This too is based on Muhammad's example. According to a hadith attributed to Aisha herself as the source, "the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years" (Bukhari, 7.62.64).

A powerful militant Muslim lobby regards this code as sacred and based on Koranic texts and sharia law. No previous Pakistani leader, not even the country's first female leader, Benazir Bhutto, dared reform it.

But Gen Musharraf's allies in parliament sparked the fury of the militant opposition by introducing a Women Protection Bill. This would remove the requirement for four male witnesses to prove rape and set 16 as the age of consent for sex with girls.

When this measure came before parliament, Islamic radicals responded by tearing up copies of the bill and storming out. "This bill is against the Holy Koran," said Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the leader of the militant opposition. "We reject it and will try to block it in any possible manner." Other MPs chanted "death to Musharraf" and "Allah is great."

There's a preview of what the British parliament will be like in a few years.

Liaqat Baluch, the deputy leader of an alliance of six Islamic parties, pledged to mount a public campaign to show that "under the garb of this bill and women's rights, the government is deviating from the Koran". The prime minister, Shaukat Aziz, countered that the militants had committed "an act of desecration" by tearing up the bill.

Gen Musharraf, who claims to favour "enlightened moderation", has waited until his seventh year in power before venturing into this uniquely sensitive political territory. But western diplomats, who have repeatedly demanded the repeal or reform of the Hudood Ordinance, believe he will succeed. The general's allies have a comfortable majority in parliament. The bill will go before a parliamentary committee, where Islamic radicals could introduce wrecking amendments. Last month Gen Musharraf, a key US ally in the war on terrorism, changed Pakistani law to allow women detained on charges of adultery and other minor crimes to be released on bail. Hundreds of women were later freed.

Until now the general, who has survived three assassination attempts by radical Islamic groups, has preferred to avoid confrontation over an issue that has not, despite an unprecedented publicity drive by the government, caught the popular imagination.

"How can a dictator propped up by the West introduce democratic reforms?" asked Hazat Aman, an official of a social welfare group run by the hardline Islamic Jamaat-i-Islami party. "It is an attack on Islam," he said.

And that's why he may prevail in the short run, in a parliamentary vote or some such, but he is unlikely to do so in the long run unless there is a larger-scale challenge to Islamic orthodoxy than has hitherto existed.

Hat tip : http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russia rejects sanctions for Iran

This should be no surprise to anyone. The U.N. Security Council has Russia and China sitting across the table from Iran. Russia is the one that caused this nuclear problem. [Russian President Vladimir] Putin has had his scientists down in Iran for years working for their missile systems, now the international "community" and the US would think Russia would show any other face ? Are we going to have Condi Rice stating her hopes for another "robust" plan and a "new Middle East" again? Putin is a jackal. Miss Rice being an "expert" on Russian culture and affairs,  better brush up on her Russian and grab some Stolyi.

Folks talk about a preemptive strike on Iran’s nuclear sites, which is needed, quite a chance this would draw Russia into a fight in the Middle East,siding with Iran.

The day has come when the West must either stand up or sit down, a time has come when the West will have to put up or shut up. Sides have been drawn and it’s clear which side Russia is on. I fear the West being more concerned with political opinions; world disapproval will continue to show itself weak at worst, naive at best.

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia on Friday rejected any talk for now of sanctions against Iran and France warned against conflict with Tehran, raising doubt whether it will face swift penalties for not halting nuclear work by an August 31 deadline.
more @ http://reuters.myway.com/article/20060825/2006-08-25T125958Z_01_L24364475_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-NUCLEAR-IRAN-DC.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »